Solana vs dYdX

Compare Solana and dYdX on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$5.693B
Solana combines Proof‑of‑History, Turbine block propagation and Gulf Stream forwarding to achieve throughput exceeding 50 000 TPS with 400 ms block times. The 2024 Firedancer client written in C++ reduced validator CPU requirements and added parallel pipeline execution. Solana Pay and the Saga phone SDK illustrate the project’s push toward consumer‑grade web3 applications.
View Full Page
$71.47M
The dYdX Chain is an app‑specific Cosmos chain that replaced the prior StarkEx L2, giving validators control over an on‑chain order book for perpetual futures. Traders retain familiar features like cross‑margin and isolated positions, and DYDX token holders secure the chain while receiving 100 % of protocol fees. Lambda architecture shards order processing across ABCI++ extensions for sub‑second latency.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Solana
TVL
$5.693B
24h Volume
$0
24h Fees
$771.4K
24h Revenue
$120.4K
30d Fees
$9.71M
30d Revenue
$1.47M
7d TVL Change
+1.54%
Dominance
2.05%
dYdX
TVL
$71.47M
24h Volume
$0
24h Fees
$1.9K
24h Revenue
$190
30d Fees
$55.9K
30d Revenue
$5.6K
7d TVL Change
+0.55%
Dominance
0.03%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Solana
98.8%
dYdX
1.2%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Solana
1.0%
dYdX
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Solana
99.8%
dYdX
1.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Solana
99.8%
dYdX
1.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Solana
1.54%
dYdX
0.55%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Solana
2.1%
dYdX
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Solana
dYdX