TON vs Unichain
Compare TON and Unichain on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$49.35M
The Open Network (TON) is a sharded Layer‑1 originally designed by Telegram, featuring dynamic workchains and instant cross‑shard consensus through the Vertical Blockchain mechanism. The TON Storage and TON DNS services extend functionality beyond payments, whereas the Tap‑to‑Transfer feature has onboarded millions of Telegram users. A 2025 governance vote approved jetton fee burns to make TON mildly deflationary.
View Full Page$30.1M
Unichain is an OP‑Stack Layer‑2 built by Uniswap Labs that employs a trusted‑execution‑environment (TEE) block builder to guarantee ordered execution free from MEV. Liquidity pools enjoy baked‑in sandwich protection, and the UNI token governs sequencer whitelists. The chain inherited native hooks from upcoming Uniswap V4, enabling dynamic fee models.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
TON
TVL$49.35M
24h Volume$3.27M
24h Fees$11.4K
24h Revenue$2.5K
30d Fees$316.5K
30d Revenue$72.4K
7d TVL Change-5.66%
Dominance0.02%
Unichain
TVL$30.1M
24h Volume$26.02M
24h Fees$6.2K
24h Revenue$3.2K
30d Fees$4.03M
30d Revenue$1.14M
7d TVL Change+1.26%
Dominance0.01%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
TON
62.1%Unichain
37.9%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
TON
11.2%Unichain
88.8%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
TON
64.8%Unichain
35.2%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
TON
44.1%Unichain
55.9%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
TON
-5.66%Unichain
1.26%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
TON
0.0%Unichain
0.0%TVL Comparison
TON
Unichain