OAKResearch

Home

Data

Cryptos
TradFi
Projects
All ProjectsHeatmapCompare
Hyperliquid
OAK Index
Yields
Portfolios

Research

See All

Feed

News
Alpha Feed
Daily Recap
Monitoring

About

Store

Block Note

Services

Our Team

Authors

Brand Kit

Affiliates

Twitter

Telegram

Discord

Instagram

Tiktok

Youtube

Legal

  1. Home
  2. Projects
  3. Apyx Protocol
  4. Vs
  5. Kinetiq

Apyx Protocol vs Kinetiq

Compare Apyx Protocol and Kinetiq on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

Apyx is a dividend-backed stablecoin protocol that turns preferred equity issued by Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies into programmable digital dollars. Its two-token model separates apxUSD, a non-yield synthetic stable asset designed for liquidity and DeFi utility, from apyUSD, a locked yield wrapper that accrues returns from dividends paid by the collateral basket. Apyx is overcollateralized, uses daily NAV transparency, automated rebalancing, stress testing and hedging, and is live on Ethereum and Base with Solana support planned.
View Full Page
$953.08M
Kinetiq is a non-custodial liquid staking protocol built natively on Hyperliquid L1. Users stake HYPE and receive kHYPE, a liquid, yield-accruing representation usable across the Hyperliquid DeFi ecosystem. Behind the scenes, StakeHub — Kinetiq’s autonomous validator scoring and delegation system — routes stake to the highest-performing validators to maximise yield and reinforce network security. kHYPE grows in value automatically through validator rewards, requires no claiming, and remains fully composable for lending, liquidity provision and advanced yield strategies. Kinetiq’s architecture emphasises security through multi-layered safeguards, multiple independent audits and a $5M bug bounty. The protocol also offers iHYPE, a compliant, institution-ready staking solution. With over a billion dollars staked, Kinetiq powers scalable, efficient and integrated liquid staking for the entire Hyperliquid ecosystem.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Apyx Protocol
TVL
N/A
24h Volume
N/A
24h Fees
$65.4K
24h Revenue
$0
30d Fees
$1.98M
30d Revenue
$0
7d TVL Change
N/A
Dominance
0.00%
Kinetiq
TVL
$953.08M
24h Volume
$3.12M
24h Fees
$50.4K
24h Revenue
$6K
30d Fees
$1.89M
30d Revenue
$244K
7d TVL Change
-41.19%
Dominance
0.40%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Apyx Protocol
1.0%
Kinetiq
1.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Apyx Protocol
1.0%
Kinetiq
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Apyx Protocol
56.5%
Kinetiq
43.5%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Apyx Protocol
1.0%
Kinetiq
100.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Apyx Protocol
N/A
Kinetiq
-41.19%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Apyx Protocol
0.0%
Kinetiq
0.4%