Babylon Protocol vs Hyperliquid
Compare Babylon Protocol and Hyperliquid on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$3.106B
Babylon exports Bitcoin’s economic security to Proof‑of‑Stake networks by letting holders restake native BTC without wrapping. Validators lock BTC in time‑locked UTXOs; mis‑behaviour is punished via cryptographic slashing that burns the locked coins. A Cosmos‑SDK based testnet secured by Babylon went live in March 2024, paving the way for mainnet in late 2025 and integrations with EigenLayer and Berachain.
View Full Page$6.902B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Babylon Protocol
TVL$3.106B
24h VolumeN/A
24h FeesN/A
24h RevenueN/A
30d FeesN/A
30d RevenueN/A
7d TVL Change+0.64%
Dominance1.12%
Hyperliquid
TVL$6.902B
24h Volume$149.28M
24h Fees$2.63M
24h Revenue$1.98M
30d Fees$68.29M
30d Revenue$52.17M
7d TVL Change+1.66%
Dominance2.48%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Babylon Protocol
31.0%Hyperliquid
69.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Babylon Protocol
1.0%Hyperliquid
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Babylon Protocol
1.0%Hyperliquid
1.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Babylon Protocol
1.0%Hyperliquid
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Babylon Protocol
0.64%Hyperliquid
1.66%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Babylon Protocol
1.1%Hyperliquid
2.5%TVL Comparison
Babylon Protocol
Hyperliquid