Babylon Protocol vs Maple
Compare Babylon Protocol and Maple on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$3.333B
Babylon exports Bitcoin’s economic security to Proof‑of‑Stake networks by letting holders restake native BTC without wrapping. Validators lock BTC in time‑locked UTXOs; mis‑behaviour is punished via cryptographic slashing that burns the locked coins. A Cosmos‑SDK based testnet secured by Babylon went live in March 2024, paving the way for mainnet in late 2025 and integrations with EigenLayer and Berachain.
View Full Page$2.715B
Maple Finance is an on‑chain capital‑markets platform that enables under‑collateralised loans to trading firms and Web3 businesses via permissioned lending pools. Pool delegates perform credit assessment and share in origination fees, while lenders earn a fixed yield plus default protection through an insurance ‘cover’ pool. As of 2025 Maple has originated over $2.3 billion across both Ethereum and Solana deployments.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Babylon Protocol
TVL$3.333B
24h VolumeN/A
24h FeesN/A
24h RevenueN/A
30d FeesN/A
30d RevenueN/A
7d TVL Change-0.83%
Dominance1.17%
Maple
TVL$2.715B
24h VolumeN/A
24h Fees$182.2K
24h Revenue$30.1K
30d Fees$9.01M
30d Revenue$1.34M
7d TVL Change-3.99%
Dominance0.96%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Babylon Protocol
55.1%Maple
44.9%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Babylon Protocol
1.0%Maple
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Babylon Protocol
1.0%Maple
1.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Babylon Protocol
1.0%Maple
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Babylon Protocol
-0.83%Maple
-3.99%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Babylon Protocol
1.2%Maple
1.0%TVL Comparison
Babylon Protocol
Maple