OAKResearch

Home

Data

Cryptos
TradFi
Projects
All ProjectsHeatmapCompare
Hyperliquid
OAK Index
Yields
Portfolios

Research

See All

Feed

News
Alpha Feed
Daily Recap
Monitoring

About

Store

Block Note

Services

Our Team

Authors

Brand Kit

Affiliates

Discord

Instagram

Telegram

Tiktok

Twitter

Youtube

Legal

  1. Home
  2. Projects
  3. Babylon Protocol
  4. Vs
  5. Pons

Babylon Protocol vs Pons

Compare Babylon Protocol and Pons on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$3.304B
Babylon exports Bitcoin’s economic security to Proof‑of‑Stake networks by letting holders restake native BTC without wrapping. Validators lock BTC in time‑locked UTXOs; mis‑behaviour is punished via cryptographic slashing that burns the locked coins. A Cosmos‑SDK based testnet secured by Babylon went live in March 2024, paving the way for mainnet in late 2025 and integrations with EigenLayer and Berachain.
View Full Page
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Babylon Protocol
TVL
$3.304B
24h Volume
N/A
24h Fees
N/A
24h Revenue
N/A
30d Fees
N/A
30d Revenue
N/A
7d TVL Change
+2.65%
Dominance
1.39%
Pons
TVL
N/A
24h Volume
N/A
24h Fees
$682.4K
24h Revenue
$178.3K
30d Fees
$4.18M
30d Revenue
$961.5K
7d TVL Change
N/A
Dominance
0.00%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Babylon Protocol
1.0%
Pons
1.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Babylon Protocol
1.0%
Pons
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Babylon Protocol
1.0%
Pons
1.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Babylon Protocol
1.0%
Pons
1.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Babylon Protocol
2.65%
Pons
N/A

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Babylon Protocol
1.4%
Pons
0.0%