Base App vs Compound V3
Compare Base App and Compound V3 on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$1.375B
Compound V3—also branded ‘Comet’—moves to a one‑way collateral model where users borrow a single base asset (USDC, ETH or WBTC) against isolated collateral lists. The simpler architecture reduces attack surface, halves gas per transaction and lets governance set per‑asset borrow caps. Launched on Ethereum in August 2022, V3 has since been ported to Arbitrum and Base and underpins products such as Coinbase’s USDC institutional lending pool.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Base App
TVLN/A
24h VolumeN/A
24h Fees$51.1K
24h Revenue$51.1K
30d Fees$422K
30d Revenue$422K
7d TVL ChangeN/A
Dominance0.00%
Compound V3
TVL$1.375B
24h VolumeN/A
24h Fees$84.6K
24h Revenue$6K
30d Fees$1.79M
30d Revenue$145K
7d TVL Change+22.59%
Dominance0.50%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Base App
1.0%Compound V3
1.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Base App
1.0%Compound V3
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Base App
37.7%Compound V3
62.3%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Base App
89.5%Compound V3
10.5%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Base App
N/ACompound V3
22.59%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Base App
0.0%Compound V3
0.5%