Centrifuge Protocol vs Hyperliquid

Compare Centrifuge Protocol and Hyperliquid on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

Centrifuge Protocol tokenizes real-world assets like invoices and credit pools for DeFi. Its infrastructure bridges traditional finance and DeFi, enabling collateralization of real-world assets for on-chain lending.
View Full Page
$7.061B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Centrifuge Protocol
TVL
N/A
24h Volume
N/A
24h Fees
$125.5K
24h Revenue
$10.6K
30d Fees
$2.89M
30d Revenue
$339.4K
7d TVL Change
N/A
Dominance
0.00%
Hyperliquid
TVL
$7.061B
24h Volume
$102.5M
24h Fees
$3.14M
24h Revenue
$2.42M
30d Fees
$88.17M
30d Revenue
$70.99M
7d TVL Change
-2.70%
Dominance
2.49%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Centrifuge Protocol
1.0%
Hyperliquid
1.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Centrifuge Protocol
1.0%
Hyperliquid
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Centrifuge Protocol
3.8%
Hyperliquid
96.2%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Centrifuge Protocol
1.0%
Hyperliquid
99.6%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Centrifuge Protocol
N/A
Hyperliquid
-2.70%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Centrifuge Protocol
0.0%
Hyperliquid
2.5%