Centrifuge Protocol vs Hyperliquid
Compare Centrifuge Protocol and Hyperliquid on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$1.62B
Centrifuge Protocol tokenizes real-world assets like invoices and credit pools for DeFi. Its infrastructure bridges traditional finance and DeFi, enabling collateralization of real-world assets for on-chain lending.
View Full Page$6.912B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Centrifuge Protocol
TVL$1.62B
24h VolumeN/A
24h Fees$94.9K
24h Revenue$16.1K
30d Fees$6.33M
30d Revenue$481.6K
7d TVL Change-1.22%
Dominance0.58%
Hyperliquid
TVL$6.912B
24h Volume$149.28M
24h Fees$2.68M
24h Revenue$2.03M
30d Fees$68.22M
30d Revenue$52.11M
7d TVL Change+1.00%
Dominance2.49%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Centrifuge Protocol
19.0%Hyperliquid
81.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Centrifuge Protocol
1.0%Hyperliquid
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Centrifuge Protocol
3.4%Hyperliquid
96.6%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Centrifuge Protocol
1.0%Hyperliquid
99.2%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Centrifuge Protocol
-1.22%Hyperliquid
1.00%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Centrifuge Protocol
0.6%Hyperliquid
2.5%TVL Comparison
Centrifuge Protocol
Hyperliquid