Centrifuge Protocol vs Maple
Compare Centrifuge Protocol and Maple on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
Centrifuge Protocol tokenizes real-world assets like invoices and credit pools for DeFi. Its infrastructure bridges traditional finance and DeFi, enabling collateralization of real-world assets for on-chain lending.
View Full Page$2.715B
Maple Finance is an on‑chain capital‑markets platform that enables under‑collateralised loans to trading firms and Web3 businesses via permissioned lending pools. Pool delegates perform credit assessment and share in origination fees, while lenders earn a fixed yield plus default protection through an insurance ‘cover’ pool. As of 2025 Maple has originated over $2.3 billion across both Ethereum and Solana deployments.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Centrifuge Protocol
TVLN/A
24h VolumeN/A
24h Fees$22.4K
24h Revenue$10.6K
30d Fees$2.89M
30d Revenue$339.4K
7d TVL ChangeN/A
Dominance0.00%
Maple
TVL$2.715B
24h VolumeN/A
24h Fees$182.2K
24h Revenue$30.1K
30d Fees$9.01M
30d Revenue$1.34M
7d TVL Change-4.04%
Dominance0.96%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Centrifuge Protocol
1.0%Maple
1.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Centrifuge Protocol
1.0%Maple
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Centrifuge Protocol
11.0%Maple
89.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Centrifuge Protocol
26.1%Maple
73.9%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Centrifuge Protocol
N/AMaple
-4.04%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Centrifuge Protocol
0.0%Maple
1.0%