Centrifuge Protocol vs Maple

Compare Centrifuge Protocol and Maple on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

Centrifuge Protocol tokenizes real-world assets like invoices and credit pools for DeFi. Its infrastructure bridges traditional finance and DeFi, enabling collateralization of real-world assets for on-chain lending.
View Full Page
$2.715B
Maple Finance is an on‑chain capital‑markets platform that enables under‑collateralised loans to trading firms and Web3 businesses via permissioned lending pools. Pool delegates perform credit assessment and share in origination fees, while lenders earn a fixed yield plus default protection through an insurance ‘cover’ pool. As of 2025 Maple has originated over $2.3 billion across both Ethereum and Solana deployments.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Centrifuge Protocol
TVL
N/A
24h Volume
N/A
24h Fees
$22.4K
24h Revenue
$10.6K
30d Fees
$2.89M
30d Revenue
$339.4K
7d TVL Change
N/A
Dominance
0.00%
Maple
TVL
$2.715B
24h Volume
N/A
24h Fees
$182.2K
24h Revenue
$30.1K
30d Fees
$9.01M
30d Revenue
$1.34M
7d TVL Change
-4.04%
Dominance
0.96%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Centrifuge Protocol
1.0%
Maple
1.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Centrifuge Protocol
1.0%
Maple
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Centrifuge Protocol
11.0%
Maple
89.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Centrifuge Protocol
26.1%
Maple
73.9%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Centrifuge Protocol
N/A
Maple
-4.04%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Centrifuge Protocol
0.0%
Maple
1.0%