Centrifuge Protocol vs Uniswap
Compare Centrifuge Protocol and Uniswap on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
Centrifuge Protocol tokenizes real-world assets like invoices and credit pools for DeFi. Its infrastructure bridges traditional finance and DeFi, enabling collateralization of real-world assets for on-chain lending.
View Full Page$4.475B
Uniswap V4 rebuilds the protocol as a ‘Singleton’ contract and introduces programmable ‘hooks’ that let pools execute arbitrary logic before and after swaps. The redesign cuts gas costs by 15‑25 % and should open the door for new order types like TWAMMs and on‑chain limit orders. V4 is expected to go live shortly after Ethereum’s Pectra upgrade, when core devs will freeze the code under a Business Source Licence.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Centrifuge Protocol
TVLN/A
24h VolumeN/A
24h Fees$340.1K
24h Revenue$10.6K
30d Fees$2.63M
30d Revenue$332.5K
7d TVL ChangeN/A
Dominance0.00%
Uniswap
TVL$4.475B
24h Volume$1.837B
24h Fees$2.17M
24h Revenue$198.2K
30d Fees$111.65M
30d Revenue$8.88M
7d TVL Change+21.57%
Dominance1.57%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Centrifuge Protocol
1.0%Uniswap
1.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Centrifuge Protocol
1.0%Uniswap
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Centrifuge Protocol
13.5%Uniswap
86.5%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Centrifuge Protocol
5.1%Uniswap
94.9%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Centrifuge Protocol
N/AUniswap
21.57%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Centrifuge Protocol
0.0%Uniswap
1.6%