Compound V3 vs Gauntlet

Compare Compound V3 and Gauntlet on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$1.153B

Compound V3—also branded ‘Comet’—moves to a one‑way collateral model where users borrow a single base asset (USDC, ETH or WBTC) against isolated collateral lists. The simpler architecture reduces attack surface, halves gas per transaction and lets governance set per‑asset borrow caps. Launched on Ethereum in August 2022, V3 has since been ported to Arbitrum and Base and underpins products such as Coinbase’s USDC institutional lending pool.

View Full Page

$1.394B

Gauntlet provides institutional-grade risk modeling and optimization for DeFi protocols. Its platform powers vault strategies, levered RWA yields, and protocol risk parameters securing billions in on-chain assets.

View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Compound V3

TVL

$1.153B

24h Volume

N/A

24h Fees

$55K

24h Revenue

$3.3K

30d Fees

$1.66M

30d Revenue

$93.3K

7d TVL Change

-0.40%

Dominance

0.48%

Gauntlet

TVL

$1.394B

24h Volume

N/A

24h Fees

$98.3K

24h Revenue

$1.1K

30d Fees

$3.27M

30d Revenue

$51.9K

7d TVL Change

Market dominance by TVL

Compound V3

0.5%

Gauntlet

0.6%

TVL Comparison

Compound V3

Gauntlet