OAKResearch

Home

Data

Cryptos
TradFi
Projects
All ProjectsHeatmapCompare
Hyperliquid
OAK Index
Yields
Portfolios

Research

See All

Feed

News
Alpha Feed
Daily Recap
Monitoring

About

Store

Block Note

Services

Our Team

Authors

Brand Kit

Affiliates

Twitter

Telegram

Discord

Instagram

Tiktok

Youtube

Legal

  1. Home
  2. Projects
  3. Compound V3
  4. Vs
  5. Kinetiq

Compound V3 vs Kinetiq

Compare Compound V3 and Kinetiq on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$1.153B
Compound V3—also branded ‘Comet’—moves to a one‑way collateral model where users borrow a single base asset (USDC, ETH or WBTC) against isolated collateral lists. The simpler architecture reduces attack surface, halves gas per transaction and lets governance set per‑asset borrow caps. Launched on Ethereum in August 2022, V3 has since been ported to Arbitrum and Base and underpins products such as Coinbase’s USDC institutional lending pool.
View Full Page
$962.24M
Kinetiq is a non-custodial liquid staking protocol built natively on Hyperliquid L1. Users stake HYPE and receive kHYPE, a liquid, yield-accruing representation usable across the Hyperliquid DeFi ecosystem. Behind the scenes, StakeHub — Kinetiq’s autonomous validator scoring and delegation system — routes stake to the highest-performing validators to maximise yield and reinforce network security. kHYPE grows in value automatically through validator rewards, requires no claiming, and remains fully composable for lending, liquidity provision and advanced yield strategies. Kinetiq’s architecture emphasises security through multi-layered safeguards, multiple independent audits and a $5M bug bounty. The protocol also offers iHYPE, a compliant, institution-ready staking solution. With over a billion dollars staked, Kinetiq powers scalable, efficient and integrated liquid staking for the entire Hyperliquid ecosystem.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Compound V3
TVL
$1.153B
24h Volume
N/A
24h Fees
$55K
24h Revenue
$3.3K
30d Fees
$1.66M
30d Revenue
$93.3K
7d TVL Change
-0.40%
Dominance
0.48%
Kinetiq
TVL
$962.24M
24h Volume
$3.12M
24h Fees
$53.8K
24h Revenue
$6.7K
30d Fees
$1.9M
30d Revenue
$244.7K
7d TVL Change
-34.58%
Dominance
0.40%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Compound V3
54.5%
Kinetiq
45.5%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Compound V3
1.0%
Kinetiq
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Compound V3
50.6%
Kinetiq
49.4%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Compound V3
33.0%
Kinetiq
67.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Compound V3
-0.40%
Kinetiq
-34.58%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Compound V3
0.5%
Kinetiq
0.4%
TVL Comparison
Compound V3
Kinetiq