Compound V3 vs Pons

Compare Compound V3 and Pons on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$1.131B
Compound V3—also branded ‘Comet’—moves to a one‑way collateral model where users borrow a single base asset (USDC, ETH or WBTC) against isolated collateral lists. The simpler architecture reduces attack surface, halves gas per transaction and lets governance set per‑asset borrow caps. Launched on Ethereum in August 2022, V3 has since been ported to Arbitrum and Base and underpins products such as Coinbase’s USDC institutional lending pool.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Compound V3
TVL
$1.131B
24h Volume
N/A
24h Fees
$61K
24h Revenue
$5.7K
30d Fees
$1.76M
30d Revenue
$131.4K
7d TVL Change
+1.03%
Dominance
0.47%
Pons
TVL
N/A
24h Volume
N/A
24h Fees
N/A
24h Revenue
N/A
30d Fees
N/A
30d Revenue
N/A
7d TVL Change
N/A
Dominance
0.00%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Compound V3
1.0%
Pons
1.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Compound V3
1.0%
Pons
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Compound V3
1.0%
Pons
1.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Compound V3
1.0%
Pons
1.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Compound V3
1.03%
Pons
N/A

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Compound V3
0.5%
Pons
0.0%