OAKResearch

Home

Data

Cryptos
TradFi
Projects
All ProjectsHeatmapCompare
Hyperliquid
OAK Index
Yields
Portfolios

Research

See All

Feed

News
Alpha Feed
Daily Recap
Monitoring

About

Store

Block Note

Services

Our Team

Authors

Brand Kit

Affiliates

Twitter

Telegram

Discord

Instagram

Tiktok

Youtube

Legal

  1. Home
  2. Projects
  3. Hyperbeat
  4. Vs
  5. Kinetiq

Hyperbeat vs Kinetiq

Compare Hyperbeat and Kinetiq on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$37.14M
Hyperbeat Earn is Hyperliquid’s native yield layer, offering automated vaults that optimize returns across HyperEVM and Hypercore. Its Meta-Vault architecture continuously allocates liquidity to the best risk-adjusted opportunities, while delta-neutral strategies leverage Hypercore funding markets and Unit Protocol to generate sustainable, market-independent yield. The product suite also includes HYPE liquid staking and HIP-3 liquidity vaults, all secured with onchain solvency proofs. Hyperbeat Earn now manages hundreds of millions in TVL and serves as the primary yield hub of the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
View Full Page
$962.24M
Kinetiq is a non-custodial liquid staking protocol built natively on Hyperliquid L1. Users stake HYPE and receive kHYPE, a liquid, yield-accruing representation usable across the Hyperliquid DeFi ecosystem. Behind the scenes, StakeHub — Kinetiq’s autonomous validator scoring and delegation system — routes stake to the highest-performing validators to maximise yield and reinforce network security. kHYPE grows in value automatically through validator rewards, requires no claiming, and remains fully composable for lending, liquidity provision and advanced yield strategies. Kinetiq’s architecture emphasises security through multi-layered safeguards, multiple independent audits and a $5M bug bounty. The protocol also offers iHYPE, a compliant, institution-ready staking solution. With over a billion dollars staked, Kinetiq powers scalable, efficient and integrated liquid staking for the entire Hyperliquid ecosystem.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Hyperbeat
TVL
$37.14M
24h Volume
$439.1K
24h Fees
$2.5K
24h Revenue
$560
30d Fees
$117.9K
30d Revenue
$30.1K
7d TVL Change
-21.66%
Dominance
0.02%
Kinetiq
TVL
$962.24M
24h Volume
$3.12M
24h Fees
$53.8K
24h Revenue
$6.7K
30d Fees
$1.9M
30d Revenue
$244.7K
7d TVL Change
-34.58%
Dominance
0.40%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Hyperbeat
3.7%
Kinetiq
96.3%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Hyperbeat
12.3%
Kinetiq
87.7%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Hyperbeat
4.4%
Kinetiq
95.6%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Hyperbeat
7.7%
Kinetiq
92.3%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Hyperbeat
-21.66%
Kinetiq
-34.58%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Hyperbeat
0.0%
Kinetiq
0.4%
TVL Comparison
Hyperbeat
Kinetiq