Hyperliquid vs Injective
Compare Hyperliquid and Injective on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$8.493B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full PageInjective Perps is the perpetual futures market of Injective, a layer 1 blockchain optimized for finance. Trading runs on Injective's native onchain order book module, which offers fully onchain matching and settlement, front-running resistance through frequent batch auctions and very low fees. Markets cover major crypto assets as well as real-world assets such as equities, commodities and forex, and the shared liquidity layer is used by multiple trading front-ends built on Injective. Part of the fees feeds the INJ burn auction.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Hyperliquid
TVL$8.493B
24h Volume$140.83M
24h Fees$3.64M
24h Revenue$2.78M
30d Fees$83.24M
30d Revenue$66.48M
7d TVL Change-0.48%
Dominance9.39%
Injective
TVLN/A
24h Volume$4.43M
24h FeesN/A
24h RevenueN/A
30d FeesN/A
30d RevenueN/A
7d TVL ChangeN/A
Dominance0.00%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Hyperliquid
1.0%Injective
1.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Hyperliquid
97.0%Injective
3.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Hyperliquid
1.0%Injective
1.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Hyperliquid
1.0%Injective
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Hyperliquid
-0.48%Injective
N/ADominance
Market dominance by TVL
Hyperliquid
9.4%Injective
0.0%