Hyperliquid vs Injective Perps
Compare Hyperliquid and Injective Perps on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$7.114B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Hyperliquid
TVL$7.114B
24h Volume$128.51M
24h Fees$3.11M
24h Revenue$2.39M
30d Fees$85.3M
30d Revenue$68.44M
7d TVL Change-0.98%
Dominance7.68%
Injective Perps
TVLN/A
24h Volume$55.2M
24h FeesN/A
24h RevenueN/A
30d FeesN/A
30d RevenueN/A
7d TVL ChangeN/A
Dominance0.00%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Hyperliquid
1.0%Injective Perps
1.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Hyperliquid
70.0%Injective Perps
30.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Hyperliquid
1.0%Injective Perps
1.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Hyperliquid
1.0%Injective Perps
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Hyperliquid
-0.98%Injective Perps
N/ADominance
Market dominance by TVL
Hyperliquid
7.7%Injective Perps
0.0%