Hyperliquid vs Jito
Compare Hyperliquid and Jito on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$8.493B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full Page$1.105B
Jito offers liquid staking on Solana with MEV‑sharing that redistributes validator MEV and priority fees to JitoSOL holders. Its client integrates the open‑source Jito Labs validator, which has captured up to 60 % of Solana MEV slots. In April 2025 Jito launched a restaking beta aligned with the upcoming Solana Firedancer client.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Hyperliquid
TVL$8.493B
24h Volume$140.83M
24h Fees$3.64M
24h Revenue$2.78M
30d Fees$83.24M
30d Revenue$66.48M
7d TVL Change-0.48%
Dominance9.39%
Jito
TVL$1.105B
24h VolumeN/A
24h Fees$290.6K
24h Revenue$5.5K
30d Fees$10.99M
30d Revenue$258.3K
7d TVL Change-2.71%
Dominance1.22%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Hyperliquid
88.5%Jito
11.5%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Hyperliquid
1.0%Jito
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Hyperliquid
92.6%Jito
7.4%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Hyperliquid
99.8%Jito
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Hyperliquid
-0.48%Jito
-2.71%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Hyperliquid
9.4%Jito
1.2%TVL Comparison
Hyperliquid
Jito