Hyperliquid vs Jupiter
Compare Hyperliquid and Jupiter on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$6.833B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full Page$1.82B
Jupiter Lend extends the Jupiter DeFi suite on Solana with money markets for earning yield and collateralized borrowing. Built in collaboration with Fluid, it lets users deposit assets into Earn vaults or use collateral in Borrow markets to access liquidity directly from Jupiter’s interface. Its architecture focuses on high capital efficiency, low-friction transactions, and integrated lending flows within Solana’s broader onchain liquidity stack.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Hyperliquid
TVL$6.833B
24h Volume$163.37M
24h Fees$2.21M
24h Revenue$1.73M
30d Fees$68.91M
30d Revenue$52.74M
7d TVL Change+0.35%
Dominance2.47%
Jupiter
TVL$1.82B
24h Volume$172.25M
24h Fees$222.3K
24h Revenue$48.4K
30d Fees$12.31M
30d Revenue$2.39M
7d TVL Change-2.30%
Dominance0.66%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Hyperliquid
79.0%Jupiter
21.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Hyperliquid
48.7%Jupiter
51.3%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Hyperliquid
90.9%Jupiter
9.1%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Hyperliquid
97.3%Jupiter
2.7%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Hyperliquid
0.35%Jupiter
-2.30%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Hyperliquid
2.5%Jupiter
0.7%TVL Comparison
Hyperliquid
Jupiter