Hyperliquid vs Lido
Compare Hyperliquid and Lido on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$6.912B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full Page$23.346B
Lido is the largest liquid‑staking protocol, minting stETH and other LSTs that track underlying validator balances 1:1 minus a 10 % reward fee. Its dual‑dao governance splits responsibility between the Lido DAO and the protocol’s Node Operator Registry, reducing centralisation risk. By May 2025 over 9 million ETH—roughly 30 % of staked supply—was custodied under Lido smart contracts.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Hyperliquid
TVL$6.912B
24h Volume$149.28M
24h Fees$2.68M
24h Revenue$2.03M
30d Fees$68.22M
30d Revenue$52.11M
7d TVL Change+1.00%
Dominance2.49%
Lido
TVL$23.346B
24h VolumeN/A
24h Fees$1.6M
24h Revenue$99.1K
30d Fees$41.06M
30d Revenue$2.55M
7d TVL Change-1.43%
Dominance8.42%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Hyperliquid
22.8%Lido
77.2%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Hyperliquid
1.0%Lido
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Hyperliquid
62.7%Lido
37.3%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Hyperliquid
95.4%Lido
4.6%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Hyperliquid
1.00%Lido
-1.43%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Hyperliquid
2.5%Lido
8.4%TVL Comparison
Hyperliquid
Lido