Hyperliquid vs Lido

Compare Hyperliquid and Lido on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$7.061B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full Page
$23.564B
Lido is the largest liquid‑staking protocol, minting stETH and other LSTs that track underlying validator balances 1:1 minus a 10 % reward fee. Its dual‑dao governance splits responsibility between the Lido DAO and the protocol’s Node Operator Registry, reducing centralisation risk. By May 2025 over 9 million ETH—roughly 30 % of staked supply—was custodied under Lido smart contracts.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Hyperliquid
TVL
$7.061B
24h Volume
$102.5M
24h Fees
$3.14M
24h Revenue
$2.42M
30d Fees
$88.17M
30d Revenue
$70.99M
7d TVL Change
-2.70%
Dominance
2.49%
Lido
TVL
$23.564B
24h Volume
N/A
24h Fees
$1.61M
24h Revenue
$98.2K
30d Fees
$52.02M
30d Revenue
$3.2M
7d TVL Change
-2.59%
Dominance
8.31%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Hyperliquid
23.1%
Lido
76.9%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Hyperliquid
1.0%
Lido
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Hyperliquid
66.1%
Lido
33.9%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Hyperliquid
96.1%
Lido
3.9%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Hyperliquid
-2.70%
Lido
-2.59%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Hyperliquid
2.5%
Lido
8.3%
TVL Comparison
Hyperliquid
Lido