Hyperliquid vs Liminal
Compare Hyperliquid and Liminal on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$6.91B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full Page$24.29M
Liminal Basis is an automated strategy protocol designed to capture basis and funding-rate opportunities on Hyperliquid. It packages market-neutral positions that combine spot and perpetual exposure, seeking yield from price convergence and funding rather than directional market moves. Strategy execution, hedging and rebalancing are automated so depositors can access the trade through an on-chain vault.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Hyperliquid
TVL$6.91B
24h Volume$149.28M
24h Fees$2.68M
24h Revenue$2.03M
30d Fees$68.22M
30d Revenue$52.11M
7d TVL Change+0.81%
Dominance2.49%
Liminal
TVL$24.29M
24h Volume$4.1K
24h Fees$4
24h Revenue$4
30d Fees$798
30d Revenue$798
7d TVL Change+4.83%
Dominance0.01%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Hyperliquid
99.6%Liminal
1.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Hyperliquid
100.0%Liminal
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Hyperliquid
100.0%Liminal
1.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Hyperliquid
100.0%Liminal
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Hyperliquid
0.81%Liminal
4.83%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Hyperliquid
2.5%Liminal
0.0%TVL Comparison
Hyperliquid
Liminal