Hyperliquid vs Maple
Compare Hyperliquid and Maple on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$6.912B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full Page$3.008B
Maple Finance is an on‑chain capital‑markets platform that enables under‑collateralised loans to trading firms and Web3 businesses via permissioned lending pools. Pool delegates perform credit assessment and share in origination fees, while lenders earn a fixed yield plus default protection through an insurance ‘cover’ pool. As of 2025 Maple has originated over $2.3 billion across both Ethereum and Solana deployments.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Hyperliquid
TVL$6.912B
24h Volume$149.28M
24h Fees$2.68M
24h Revenue$2.03M
30d Fees$68.22M
30d Revenue$52.11M
7d TVL Change+1.00%
Dominance2.49%
Maple
TVL$3.008B
24h VolumeN/A
24h Fees$1.06M
24h Revenue$168K
30d Fees$10.35M
30d Revenue$1.29M
7d TVL Change-2.01%
Dominance1.09%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Hyperliquid
69.7%Maple
30.3%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Hyperliquid
1.0%Maple
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Hyperliquid
71.7%Maple
28.3%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Hyperliquid
92.4%Maple
7.6%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Hyperliquid
1.00%Maple
-2.01%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Hyperliquid
2.5%Maple
1.1%TVL Comparison
Hyperliquid
Maple