Hyperliquid vs Orderly
Compare Hyperliquid and Orderly on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$8.493B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full Page$24.22M
The Orderly Bridge tracks the assets deposited into Orderly, the omnichain order book infrastructure behind many perpetual DEXs. Users deposit from Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain and other networks, and their funds are settled on Orderly's own chain, where a shared central limit order book serves every front end built on Orderly. The bridged balance is the collateral used for trading across those venues.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Hyperliquid
TVL$8.493B
24h Volume$140.83M
24h Fees$3.64M
24h Revenue$2.78M
30d Fees$83.24M
30d Revenue$66.48M
7d TVL Change-0.48%
Dominance9.39%
Orderly
TVL$24.22M
24h Volume$41.95M
24h Fees$3.1K
24h RevenueN/A
30d Fees$162.5K
30d RevenueN/A
7d TVL Change-1.53%
Dominance0.03%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Hyperliquid
99.7%Orderly
1.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Hyperliquid
77.1%Orderly
22.9%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Hyperliquid
99.9%Orderly
1.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Hyperliquid
1.0%Orderly
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Hyperliquid
-0.48%Orderly
-1.53%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Hyperliquid
9.4%Orderly
0.0%TVL Comparison
Hyperliquid
Orderly