Hyperliquid vs Pons
Compare Hyperliquid and Pons on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$7.09B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Hyperliquid
TVL$7.09B
24h Volume$143.98M
24h Fees$1.65M
24h Revenue$1.31M
30d Fees$71.73M
30d Revenue$55.53M
7d TVL Change+3.14%
Dominance2.48%
Pons
TVLN/A
24h VolumeN/A
24h FeesN/A
24h RevenueN/A
30d FeesN/A
30d RevenueN/A
7d TVL ChangeN/A
Dominance0.00%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Hyperliquid
1.0%Pons
1.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Hyperliquid
1.0%Pons
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Hyperliquid
1.0%Pons
1.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Hyperliquid
1.0%Pons
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Hyperliquid
3.14%Pons
N/ADominance
Market dominance by TVL
Hyperliquid
2.5%Pons
0.0%