Hyperliquid vs Portal

Compare Hyperliquid and Portal on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$6.89B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full Page
$1.533B
Portal is the user interface for Wormhole, a cross‑chain messaging protocol secured by a 19‑guardian proof‑of‑authority network. It supports token transfers, NFT teleports and arbitrary message passing between more than 30 chains, including Solana, Ethereum and Aptos. A governance token airdrop was announced for Q3 2025 following the Guardian Lightpaper outlining a move to delegated staking.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Hyperliquid
TVL
$6.89B
24h Volume
$149.28M
24h Fees
$2.63M
24h Revenue
$1.98M
30d Fees
$68.29M
30d Revenue
$52.17M
7d TVL Change
+1.33%
Dominance
2.48%
Portal
TVL
$1.533B
24h Volume
N/A
24h Fees
$507
24h Revenue
$0
30d Fees
$12.8K
30d Revenue
$0
7d TVL Change
-1.76%
Dominance
0.55%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Hyperliquid
81.8%
Portal
18.2%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Hyperliquid
1.0%
Portal
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Hyperliquid
100.0%
Portal
1.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Hyperliquid
100.0%
Portal
1.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Hyperliquid
1.33%
Portal
-1.76%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Hyperliquid
2.5%
Portal
0.6%
TVL Comparison
Hyperliquid
Portal