Hyperliquid vs Pump
Compare Hyperliquid and Pump on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$7.072B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full Page$355.18M
Key Metrics Comparison
Hyperliquid
TVL$7.072B
24h Volume$128.51M
24h Fees$3.11M
24h Revenue$2.39M
30d Fees$85.3M
30d Revenue$68.44M
7d TVL Change-2.05%
Dominance7.83%
Pump
TVL$355.18M
24h Volume$565.18M
24h Fees$5.37M
24h Revenue$1.87M
30d Fees$178.89M
30d Revenue$61.12M
7d TVL Change-0.69%
Dominance0.39%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Hyperliquid
95.2%Pump
4.8%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Hyperliquid
18.5%Pump
81.5%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Hyperliquid
36.6%Pump
63.4%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Hyperliquid
56.1%Pump
43.9%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Hyperliquid
-2.05%Pump
-0.69%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Hyperliquid
7.8%Pump
0.4%TVL Comparison
Hyperliquid
Pump