Hyperliquid vs SSV Network
Compare Hyperliquid and SSV Network on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$7.118B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full Page$13.143B
Key Metrics Comparison
Hyperliquid
TVL$7.118B
24h Volume$128.51M
24h Fees$3.11M
24h Revenue$2.39M
30d Fees$85.3M
30d Revenue$68.44M
7d TVL Change-0.88%
Dominance7.65%
SSV Network
TVL$13.143B
24h VolumeN/A
24h Fees$10.3K
24h Revenue$9.6K
30d Fees$310.3K
30d Revenue$304.7K
7d TVL Change+3.37%
Dominance14.13%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Hyperliquid
35.1%SSV Network
64.9%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Hyperliquid
1.0%SSV Network
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Hyperliquid
99.7%SSV Network
1.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Hyperliquid
99.6%SSV Network
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Hyperliquid
-0.88%SSV Network
3.37%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Hyperliquid
7.6%SSV Network
14.1%TVL Comparison
Hyperliquid
SSV Network