Hyperliquid vs Stream Finance
Compare Hyperliquid and Stream Finance on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$7.219B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full PageStream gives users exposure to market-making and delta-neutral strategies through decentralized infrastructure. Users pay up to 10% performance fees, with potential additional share if returns exceed projected APY. The strategies focus on DEX and DeFi-only trades, but when capacity is reached, Stream may partner with major market makers to continue generating yield. Any such positions are announced and shown in the transparency dashboard.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Hyperliquid
TVL$7.219B
24h Volume$126.18M
24h Fees$2.75M
24h Revenue$2.18M
30d Fees$88.39M
30d Revenue$71.6M
7d TVL Change-3.99%
Dominance2.51%
Stream Finance
TVLN/A
24h VolumeN/A
24h FeesN/A
24h RevenueN/A
30d FeesN/A
30d RevenueN/A
7d TVL ChangeN/A
Dominance0.00%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Hyperliquid
1.0%Stream Finance
1.0%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Hyperliquid
1.0%Stream Finance
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Hyperliquid
1.0%Stream Finance
1.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Hyperliquid
1.0%Stream Finance
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Hyperliquid
-3.99%Stream Finance
N/ADominance
Market dominance by TVL
Hyperliquid
2.5%Stream Finance
0.0%TVL Comparison
Hyperliquid
Stream Finance