Hyperliquid vs Uniswap
Compare Hyperliquid and Uniswap on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$6.898B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full Page$3.518B
Uniswap V3 pioneered concentrated liquidity ranges and multiple fee tiers, letting LPs choose custom price curves and earn up to 4000 × higher fee capital efficiency. It introduced NFTs to represent positions and a licence that restricts commercial forks for two years. As of 2025 V3 is deployed on more than 15 chains and retains over 60 % DEX market share by volume.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Hyperliquid
TVL$6.898B
24h Volume$163.37M
24h Fees$2.21M
24h Revenue$1.73M
30d Fees$68.91M
30d Revenue$52.74M
7d TVL Change+0.97%
Dominance2.42%
Uniswap
TVL$3.518B
24h Volume$2.226B
24h Fees$9.02M
24h Revenue$531.8K
30d Fees$119.32M
30d Revenue$9.45M
7d TVL Change+2.20%
Dominance1.23%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Hyperliquid
66.2%Uniswap
33.8%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Hyperliquid
6.8%Uniswap
93.2%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Hyperliquid
19.7%Uniswap
80.3%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Hyperliquid
76.5%Uniswap
23.5%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Hyperliquid
0.97%Uniswap
2.20%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Hyperliquid
2.4%Uniswap
1.2%TVL Comparison
Hyperliquid
Uniswap