Hyperliquid vs Veda
Compare Hyperliquid and Veda on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$6.91B
The Hyperliquid Bridge settles deposits and withdrawals between Ethereum and Hyperliquid’s Layer‑2 exchange once two‑thirds of validator stake signs the transaction. A light‑client circuit batches proofs so users receive near‑instant credit on Hyperliquid while final settlement finality matches Ethereum’s L1. Since launch in February 2025, average bridge latency has been under 90 seconds with no recorded reorg incidents.
View Full Page$1.705B
Veda tokenises DeFi strategy vaults as ERC‑4626 ‘vTokens’ that stream strategy yield directly to holders. Vault managers can plug into Veda’s automation network to rebalance positions and roll over expiring perps without gas overhead. Early vaults include principal‑protected ETH‑BTC basis trades and leveraged stETH/ETH LP positions.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Hyperliquid
TVL$6.91B
24h Volume$149.28M
24h Fees$2.68M
24h Revenue$2.03M
30d Fees$68.22M
30d Revenue$52.11M
7d TVL Change+0.81%
Dominance2.49%
Veda
TVL$1.705B
24h VolumeN/A
24h Fees$126.9K
24h Revenue$28.2K
30d Fees$4.03M
30d Revenue$834.3K
7d TVL Change+1.78%
Dominance0.61%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Hyperliquid
80.2%Veda
19.8%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Hyperliquid
1.0%Veda
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Hyperliquid
95.5%Veda
4.5%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Hyperliquid
98.6%Veda
1.4%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Hyperliquid
0.81%Veda
1.78%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Hyperliquid
2.5%Veda
0.6%TVL Comparison
Hyperliquid
Veda