HyperSwap vs Injective

Compare HyperSwap and Injective on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$16.53M
HyperSwap V3 is a concentrated-liquidity automated market maker on HyperEVM. Liquidity providers choose price ranges for their capital, allowing active liquidity to support swaps more efficiently than a full-range pool while earning fees from trades. The exchange is integrated with HyperSwap's broader routing, liquidity and terminal products across the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
View Full Page
Injective Perps is the perpetual futures market of Injective, a layer 1 blockchain optimized for finance. Trading runs on Injective's native onchain order book module, which offers fully onchain matching and settlement, front-running resistance through frequent batch auctions and very low fees. Markets cover major crypto assets as well as real-world assets such as equities, commodities and forex, and the shared liquidity layer is used by multiple trading front-ends built on Injective. Part of the fees feeds the INJ burn auction.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

HyperSwap
TVL
$16.53M
24h Volume
$2.12M
24h Fees
$5.6K
24h Revenue
$1.2K
30d Fees
$229.6K
30d Revenue
$51.9K
7d TVL Change
-5.49%
Dominance
0.02%
Injective
TVL
N/A
24h Volume
$4.43M
24h Fees
N/A
24h Revenue
N/A
30d Fees
N/A
30d Revenue
N/A
7d TVL Change
N/A
Dominance
0.00%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
HyperSwap
1.0%
Injective
1.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
HyperSwap
32.4%
Injective
67.6%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
HyperSwap
1.0%
Injective
1.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
HyperSwap
1.0%
Injective
1.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
HyperSwap
-5.49%
Injective
N/A

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
HyperSwap
0.0%
Injective
0.0%