HyperSwap vs Maple
Compare HyperSwap and Maple on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$17.08M
HyperSwap V3 is a concentrated-liquidity automated market maker on HyperEVM. Liquidity providers choose price ranges for their capital, allowing active liquidity to support swaps more efficiently than a full-range pool while earning fees from trades. The exchange is integrated with HyperSwap's broader routing, liquidity and terminal products across the Hyperliquid ecosystem.
View Full Page$2.715B
Maple Finance is an on‑chain capital‑markets platform that enables under‑collateralised loans to trading firms and Web3 businesses via permissioned lending pools. Pool delegates perform credit assessment and share in origination fees, while lenders earn a fixed yield plus default protection through an insurance ‘cover’ pool. As of 2025 Maple has originated over $2.3 billion across both Ethereum and Solana deployments.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
HyperSwap
TVL$17.08M
24h Volume$2.69M
24h Fees$7K
24h Revenue$1.7K
30d Fees$235K
30d Revenue$50.4K
7d TVL Change-4.33%
Dominance0.01%
Maple
TVL$2.715B
24h VolumeN/A
24h Fees$182.2K
24h Revenue$30.1K
30d Fees$9.01M
30d Revenue$1.34M
7d TVL Change-4.04%
Dominance0.96%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
HyperSwap
1.0%Maple
99.4%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
HyperSwap
1.0%Maple
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
HyperSwap
3.7%Maple
96.3%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
HyperSwap
5.5%Maple
94.5%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
HyperSwap
-4.33%Maple
-4.04%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
HyperSwap
0.0%Maple
1.0%TVL Comparison
HyperSwap
Maple