Jupiter vs Orderly

Compare Jupiter and Orderly on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$2.357B
Jupiter Lend extends the Jupiter DeFi suite on Solana with money markets for earning yield and collateralized borrowing. Built in collaboration with Fluid, it lets users deposit assets into Earn vaults or use collateral in Borrow markets to access liquidity directly from Jupiter’s interface. Its architecture focuses on high capital efficiency, low-friction transactions, and integrated lending flows within Solana’s broader onchain liquidity stack.
View Full Page
$24.22M
The Orderly Bridge tracks the assets deposited into Orderly, the omnichain order book infrastructure behind many perpetual DEXs. Users deposit from Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain and other networks, and their funds are settled on Orderly's own chain, where a shared central limit order book serves every front end built on Orderly. The bridged balance is the collateral used for trading across those venues.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Jupiter
TVL
$2.357B
24h Volume
$120.7M
24h Fees
$398.8K
24h Revenue
$101.8K
30d Fees
$15.98M
30d Revenue
$4.34M
7d TVL Change
-4.93%
Dominance
2.61%
Orderly
TVL
$24.22M
24h Volume
$41.95M
24h Fees
$3.1K
24h Revenue
N/A
30d Fees
$162.5K
30d Revenue
N/A
7d TVL Change
-1.53%
Dominance
0.03%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Jupiter
99.0%
Orderly
1.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Jupiter
74.2%
Orderly
25.8%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Jupiter
99.2%
Orderly
1.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Jupiter
1.0%
Orderly
1.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Jupiter
-4.93%
Orderly
-1.53%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Jupiter
2.6%
Orderly
0.0%
TVL Comparison
Jupiter
Orderly