Jupiter vs Uniswap
Compare Jupiter and Uniswap on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$1.89B
Jupiter Lend extends the Jupiter DeFi suite on Solana with money markets for earning yield and collateralized borrowing. Built in collaboration with Fluid, it lets users deposit assets into Earn vaults or use collateral in Borrow markets to access liquidity directly from Jupiter’s interface. Its architecture focuses on high capital efficiency, low-friction transactions, and integrated lending flows within Solana’s broader onchain liquidity stack.
View Full Page$3.951B
Uniswap V3 pioneered concentrated liquidity ranges and multiple fee tiers, letting LPs choose custom price curves and earn up to 4000 × higher fee capital efficiency. It introduced NFTs to represent positions and a licence that restricts commercial forks for two years. As of 2025 V3 is deployed on more than 15 chains and retains over 60 % DEX market share by volume.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Jupiter
TVL$1.89B
24h Volume$145.18M
24h Fees$744K
24h Revenue$159.6K
30d Fees$12.09M
30d Revenue$2.24M
7d TVL Change-9.29%
Dominance0.66%
Uniswap
TVL$3.951B
24h Volume$1.835B
24h Fees$2.6M
24h Revenue$176K
30d Fees$142.69M
30d Revenue$11.43M
7d TVL Change-1.20%
Dominance1.37%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Jupiter
32.4%Uniswap
67.6%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Jupiter
7.3%Uniswap
92.7%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Jupiter
22.2%Uniswap
77.8%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Jupiter
47.6%Uniswap
52.4%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Jupiter
-9.29%Uniswap
-1.20%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Jupiter
0.7%Uniswap
1.4%TVL Comparison
Jupiter
Uniswap