OAKResearch

Home

Data

Cryptos
TradFi
Projects
All ProjectsHeatmapCompare
Hyperliquid
OAK Index
Yields
Portfolios

Research

See All

Feed

News
Alpha Feed
Daily Recap
Monitoring

About

Store

Block Note

Services

Our Team

Authors

Brand Kit

Affiliates

Twitter

Telegram

Discord

Instagram

Tiktok

Youtube

Legal

  1. Home
  2. Projects
  3. Kinetiq
  4. Vs
  5. Layerzero

Kinetiq vs LayerZero

Compare Kinetiq and LayerZero on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$953.08M
Kinetiq is a non-custodial liquid staking protocol built natively on Hyperliquid L1. Users stake HYPE and receive kHYPE, a liquid, yield-accruing representation usable across the Hyperliquid DeFi ecosystem. Behind the scenes, StakeHub — Kinetiq’s autonomous validator scoring and delegation system — routes stake to the highest-performing validators to maximise yield and reinforce network security. kHYPE grows in value automatically through validator rewards, requires no claiming, and remains fully composable for lending, liquidity provision and advanced yield strategies. Kinetiq’s architecture emphasises security through multi-layered safeguards, multiple independent audits and a $5M bug bounty. The protocol also offers iHYPE, a compliant, institution-ready staking solution. With over a billion dollars staked, Kinetiq powers scalable, efficient and integrated liquid staking for the entire Hyperliquid ecosystem.
View Full Page
$6.851B
LayerZero is an omnichain interoperability protocol designed to enable applications, assets, and messages to move seamlessly across blockchains. Built around its lightweight messaging infrastructure, LayerZero powers cross-chain products such as Stargate and supports asset issuance, value transfer, and omnichain application development. The protocol secures tens of billions of dollars in assets, has processed hundreds of billions in historical volume, and is trusted by hundreds of organizations including PayPal, Tether, Google Cloud, Paxos, and Ondo to build scalable cross-chain experiences.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Kinetiq
TVL
$953.08M
24h Volume
$3.12M
24h Fees
$50.4K
24h Revenue
$6K
30d Fees
$1.89M
30d Revenue
$244K
7d TVL Change
-41.19%
Dominance
0.40%
LayerZero
TVL
$6.851B
24h Volume
N/A
24h Fees
$2.2K
24h Revenue
$0
30d Fees
$124.3K
30d Revenue
$134.5K
7d TVL Change
-3.27%
Dominance
2.87%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Kinetiq
12.2%
LayerZero
87.8%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Kinetiq
1.0%
LayerZero
1.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Kinetiq
95.7%
LayerZero
4.3%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Kinetiq
100.0%
LayerZero
1.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Kinetiq
-41.19%
LayerZero
-3.27%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Kinetiq
0.4%
LayerZero
2.9%
TVL Comparison
Kinetiq
LayerZero