Liminal vs Maple
Compare Liminal and Maple on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$24.29M
Liminal Basis is an automated strategy protocol designed to capture basis and funding-rate opportunities on Hyperliquid. It packages market-neutral positions that combine spot and perpetual exposure, seeking yield from price convergence and funding rather than directional market moves. Strategy execution, hedging and rebalancing are automated so depositors can access the trade through an on-chain vault.
View Full Page$3.008B
Maple Finance is an on‑chain capital‑markets platform that enables under‑collateralised loans to trading firms and Web3 businesses via permissioned lending pools. Pool delegates perform credit assessment and share in origination fees, while lenders earn a fixed yield plus default protection through an insurance ‘cover’ pool. As of 2025 Maple has originated over $2.3 billion across both Ethereum and Solana deployments.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Liminal
TVL$24.29M
24h Volume$4.1K
24h Fees$4
24h Revenue$4
30d Fees$798
30d Revenue$798
7d TVL Change+4.83%
Dominance0.01%
Maple
TVL$3.008B
24h VolumeN/A
24h Fees$1.06M
24h Revenue$168K
30d Fees$10.35M
30d Revenue$1.29M
7d TVL Change-2.01%
Dominance1.09%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Liminal
1.0%Maple
99.2%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Liminal
1.0%Maple
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Liminal
1.0%Maple
100.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Liminal
1.0%Maple
100.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Liminal
4.83%Maple
-2.01%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Liminal
0.0%Maple
1.1%TVL Comparison
Liminal
Maple