Liminal vs Uniswap
Compare Liminal and Uniswap on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$20.81M
Liminal Basis is an automated strategy protocol designed to capture basis and funding-rate opportunities on Hyperliquid. It packages market-neutral positions that combine spot and perpetual exposure, seeking yield from price convergence and funding rather than directional market moves. Strategy execution, hedging and rebalancing are automated so depositors can access the trade through an on-chain vault.
View Full Page$4.475B
Uniswap V4 rebuilds the protocol as a ‘Singleton’ contract and introduces programmable ‘hooks’ that let pools execute arbitrary logic before and after swaps. The redesign cuts gas costs by 15‑25 % and should open the door for new order types like TWAMMs and on‑chain limit orders. V4 is expected to go live shortly after Ethereum’s Pectra upgrade, when core devs will freeze the code under a Business Source Licence.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Liminal
TVL$20.81M
24h Volume$302
24h Fees$0
24h Revenue$0
30d Fees$140
30d Revenue$140
7d TVL Change-0.64%
Dominance0.01%
Uniswap
TVL$4.475B
24h Volume$1.837B
24h Fees$2.17M
24h Revenue$198.2K
30d Fees$111.65M
30d Revenue$8.88M
7d TVL Change+21.57%
Dominance1.57%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Liminal
1.0%Uniswap
99.5%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Liminal
1.0%Uniswap
100.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Liminal
1.0%Uniswap
100.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Liminal
1.0%Uniswap
100.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Liminal
-0.64%Uniswap
21.57%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Liminal
0.0%Uniswap
1.6%TVL Comparison
Liminal
Uniswap