Aptos vs Monad

Compare Aptos and Monad on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$44.2M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page
$985.48M
Monad is an Ethereum-compatible Layer-1 focused on high throughput, low fees and scalable decentralization. Its architecture targets 10,000 TPS with sub-second finality while preserving bytecode-level EVM compatibility, so Solidity contracts, wallets and infrastructure can work without major rewrites. The MON token is tracked by CoinGecko as the network's associated asset.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Aptos
TVL
$44.2M
24h Volume
$5.48M
24h Fees
$51K
24h Revenue
$31.9K
30d Fees
$1.34M
30d Revenue
$670.4K
7d TVL Change
+0.99%
Dominance
0.02%
Monad
TVL
$985.48M
24h Volume
$43.41M
24h Fees
$205.1K
24h Revenue
$21K
30d Fees
$6.38M
30d Revenue
$739.9K
7d TVL Change
+0.51%
Dominance
0.35%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Aptos
4.3%
Monad
95.7%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Aptos
11.2%
Monad
88.8%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Aptos
19.9%
Monad
80.1%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Aptos
60.3%
Monad
39.7%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Aptos
0.99%
Monad
0.51%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Aptos
0.0%
Monad
0.3%
TVL Comparison
Aptos
Monad