Aptos vs Monad
Compare Aptos and Monad on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$55.45M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page$955.16M
Monad is an Ethereum-compatible Layer-1 focused on high throughput, low fees and scalable decentralization. Its architecture targets 10,000 TPS with sub-second finality while preserving bytecode-level EVM compatibility, so Solidity contracts, wallets and infrastructure can work without major rewrites. The MON token is tracked by CoinGecko as the network's associated asset.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Aptos
TVL$55.45M
24h Volume$63.33M
24h Fees$163.2K
24h Revenue$52.2K
30d Fees$5.21M
30d Revenue$1.67M
7d TVL Change-8.37%
Dominance0.02%
Monad
TVL$955.16M
24h Volume$94.33M
24h Fees$64.8K
24h Revenue$13.9K
30d Fees$4.03M
30d Revenue$1.14M
7d TVL Change+2.68%
Dominance0.34%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Aptos
5.5%Monad
94.5%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Aptos
40.2%Monad
59.8%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Aptos
71.6%Monad
28.4%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Aptos
79.0%Monad
21.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Aptos
-8.37%Monad
2.68%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Aptos
0.0%Monad
0.3%TVL Comparison
Aptos
Monad