Aptos vs Near

Compare Aptos and Near on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$49.52M
Aptos is a Layer‑1 written in Rust that uses the Move language and AptosBFT v4—a Diem‑derived HotStuff variant—to finalise blocks in less than 1 second. Its Block‑STM executor runs transactions in parallel and abort‑reexecutes on conflict, achieving > 100k TPS in public benchmarks. The 2024 ‘Quorum Store’ upgrade optimised mempool sharding and reduced latency under network partition.
View Full Page
$245.16M
NEAR Protocol employs Nightshade sharding where each block contains chunks from multiple shards, and Doomslug consensus gives 1‑second near‑finality. The JavaScript SDK and Contract Aurora EVM make onboarding Web2 developers easier. In 2024 NEAR launched a chain‑signature wallet standard that leverages passkeys for seedless login.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Aptos
TVL
$49.52M
24h Volume
$33.14M
24h Fees
$82.3K
24h Revenue
$26.3K
30d Fees
$3.71M
30d Revenue
$1.19M
7d TVL Change
-10.55%
Dominance
0.02%
Near
TVL
$245.16M
24h Volume
$20.24M
24h Fees
$41.7K
24h Revenue
$8.3K
30d Fees
$1.13M
30d Revenue
$226K
7d TVL Change
+3.18%
Dominance
0.09%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Aptos
16.8%
Near
83.2%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Aptos
62.1%
Near
37.9%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Aptos
66.4%
Near
33.6%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Aptos
75.9%
Near
24.1%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Aptos
-10.55%
Near
3.18%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Aptos
0.0%
Near
0.1%
TVL Comparison
Aptos
Near