Arbitrum vs Monad
Compare Arbitrum and Monad on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$1.388B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page$955.16M
Monad is an Ethereum-compatible Layer-1 focused on high throughput, low fees and scalable decentralization. Its architecture targets 10,000 TPS with sub-second finality while preserving bytecode-level EVM compatibility, so Solidity contracts, wallets and infrastructure can work without major rewrites. The MON token is tracked by CoinGecko as the network's associated asset.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Arbitrum
TVL$1.388B
24h Volume$94.33M
24h Fees$64.8K
24h Revenue$13.9K
30d Fees$4.03M
30d Revenue$1.14M
7d TVL Change-1.21%
Dominance0.50%
Monad
TVL$955.16M
24h Volume$94.33M
24h Fees$64.8K
24h Revenue$13.9K
30d Fees$4.03M
30d Revenue$1.14M
7d TVL Change+2.68%
Dominance0.34%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Arbitrum
59.2%Monad
40.8%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Arbitrum
50.0%Monad
50.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Arbitrum
50.0%Monad
50.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Arbitrum
50.0%Monad
50.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Arbitrum
-1.21%Monad
2.68%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Arbitrum
0.5%Monad
0.3%TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
Monad