Arbitrum vs Monad
Compare Arbitrum and Monad on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$1.405B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page$985.63M
Monad is an Ethereum-compatible Layer-1 focused on high throughput, low fees and scalable decentralization. Its architecture targets 10,000 TPS with sub-second finality while preserving bytecode-level EVM compatibility, so Solidity contracts, wallets and infrastructure can work without major rewrites. The MON token is tracked by CoinGecko as the network's associated asset.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Arbitrum
TVL$1.405B
24h Volume$271.24M
24h Fees$2.3M
24h Revenue$149.4K
30d Fees$20.08M
30d Revenue$4.29M
7d TVL Change+4.27%
Dominance0.50%
Monad
TVL$985.63M
24h Volume$43.41M
24h Fees$205.1K
24h Revenue$21K
30d Fees$6.38M
30d Revenue$739.9K
7d TVL Change+0.51%
Dominance0.35%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Arbitrum
58.8%Monad
41.2%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Arbitrum
86.2%Monad
13.8%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Arbitrum
91.8%Monad
8.2%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Arbitrum
87.7%Monad
12.3%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Arbitrum
4.27%Monad
0.51%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Arbitrum
0.5%Monad
0.3%TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
Monad