Arbitrum vs Polygon
Compare Arbitrum and Polygon on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$1.406B
Arbitrum One and Nova are optimistic rollups using Nitro fraud proofs that compress transactions into calldata submitted to Ethereum. The Orbit toolkit lets projects deploy their own Arbitrum Orbit chains with configurable permissions. ARB token governance manages the 3 000‑plus validator whitelist and a 1 billion‑dollar ecosystem grant fund.
View Full Page$681.78M
Polygon PoS combines Plasma checkpoints with a Proof‑of‑Stake validator set, supplying low‑fee EVM smart contracts. The Polygon 2.0 roadmap introduces Aggregation Layer and.zk‑powered chains (CDK) that will share a unified POL staking token. Partnerships with Starbucks Odyssey and DraftKings underline its consumer‑brand strategy.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Arbitrum
TVL$1.406B
24h Volume$148.04M
24h Fees$387.8K
24h Revenue$83.9K
30d Fees$20.09M
30d Revenue$4.26M
7d TVL Change+3.01%
Dominance0.50%
Polygon
TVL$681.78M
24h Volume$133.02M
24h Fees$1.22M
24h Revenue$561.2K
30d Fees$36.95M
30d Revenue$17.96M
7d TVL Change+0.98%
Dominance0.24%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Arbitrum
67.3%Polygon
32.7%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Arbitrum
52.7%Polygon
47.3%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Arbitrum
24.2%Polygon
75.8%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Arbitrum
13.0%Polygon
87.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Arbitrum
3.01%Polygon
0.98%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Arbitrum
0.5%Polygon
0.2%TVL Comparison
Arbitrum
Polygon