Avalanche vs Monad
Compare Avalanche and Monad on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$595.64M
Avalanche implements Snowman consensus on its C‑Chain (EVM) and runs a multi‑chain architecture with X‑Chain (UTXO) and P‑Chain (staking). Custom subnets allow projects like DeFi Kingdoms and Intain RWA to spin up their own validator sets with whitelisted tokens. The 2025 Banff hard fork added elastic subnets with dynamic validator staking for improved security sharing.
View Full Page$983.03M
Monad is an Ethereum-compatible Layer-1 focused on high throughput, low fees and scalable decentralization. Its architecture targets 10,000 TPS with sub-second finality while preserving bytecode-level EVM compatibility, so Solidity contracts, wallets and infrastructure can work without major rewrites. The MON token is tracked by CoinGecko as the network's associated asset.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Avalanche
TVL$595.64M
24h Volume$111.99M
24h Fees$304.9K
24h Revenue$100K
30d Fees$11.15M
30d Revenue$4.22M
7d TVL Change+1.87%
Dominance0.21%
Monad
TVL$983.03M
24h Volume$43.41M
24h Fees$205.1K
24h Revenue$21K
30d Fees$6.38M
30d Revenue$739.9K
7d TVL Change+0.51%
Dominance0.35%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Avalanche
37.7%Monad
62.3%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Avalanche
72.1%Monad
27.9%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Avalanche
59.8%Monad
40.2%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Avalanche
82.6%Monad
17.4%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Avalanche
1.87%Monad
0.51%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Avalanche
0.2%Monad
0.3%TVL Comparison
Avalanche
Monad