Avalanche vs Polygon

Compare Avalanche and Polygon on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$472.25M
Avalanche implements Snowman consensus on its C‑Chain (EVM) and runs a multi‑chain architecture with X‑Chain (UTXO) and P‑Chain (staking). Custom subnets allow projects like DeFi Kingdoms and Intain RWA to spin up their own validator sets with whitelisted tokens. The 2025 Banff hard fork added elastic subnets with dynamic validator staking for improved security sharing.
View Full Page
$785.18M
Polygon PoS combines Plasma checkpoints with a Proof‑of‑Stake validator set, supplying low‑fee EVM smart contracts. The Polygon 2.0 roadmap introduces Aggregation Layer and.zk‑powered chains (CDK) that will share a unified POL staking token. Partnerships with Starbucks Odyssey and DraftKings underline its consumer‑brand strategy.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Avalanche
TVL
$472.25M
24h Volume
$30.63M
24h Fees
$8.3K
24h Revenue
$4.2K
30d Fees
$4.03M
30d Revenue
$1.14M
7d TVL Change
-0.89%
Dominance
0.17%
Polygon
TVL
$785.18M
24h Volume
$30.63M
24h Fees
$8.3K
24h Revenue
$4.2K
30d Fees
$4.03M
30d Revenue
$1.14M
7d TVL Change
-3.98%
Dominance
0.28%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Avalanche
37.6%
Polygon
62.4%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Avalanche
50.0%
Polygon
50.0%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Avalanche
50.0%
Polygon
50.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Avalanche
50.0%
Polygon
50.0%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Avalanche
-0.89%
Polygon
-3.98%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Avalanche
0.2%
Polygon
0.3%
TVL Comparison
Avalanche
Polygon