Injective vs Near
Compare Injective and Near on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$13.46M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full Page$275.97M
NEAR Protocol employs Nightshade sharding where each block contains chunks from multiple shards, and Doomslug consensus gives 1‑second near‑finality. The JavaScript SDK and Contract Aurora EVM make onboarding Web2 developers easier. In 2024 NEAR launched a chain‑signature wallet standard that leverages passkeys for seedless login.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Injective
TVL$13.46M
24h Volume$339K
24h Fees$8.6K
24h Revenue$8.6K
30d Fees$523.8K
30d Revenue$523.8K
7d TVL Change+1.28%
Dominance0.00%
Near
TVL$275.97M
24h Volume$13.88M
24h Fees$38.4K
24h Revenue$7.7K
30d Fees$1.1M
30d Revenue$219.2K
7d TVL Change+21.40%
Dominance0.09%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Injective
4.7%Near
95.3%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Injective
2.4%Near
97.6%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Injective
18.2%Near
81.8%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Injective
52.7%Near
47.3%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Injective
1.28%Near
21.40%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Injective
0.0%Near
0.1%TVL Comparison
Injective
Near