Injective vs Polygon
Compare Injective and Polygon on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$14.77M
Injective is a Cosmos‑SDK Layer‑1 with on‑chain order books, zero‑gas trading and a frequent batch auction that mitigates MEV. Its built‑in Ethereum bridge lets users bring ERC‑20s without custodial risk, and the WasmX module supports CosmWasm smart contracts. INJ holders can stake or participate in governance that controls upgrades like the 2024 Volan hard fork which added liquid staking.
View Full Page$676.83M
Polygon PoS combines Plasma checkpoints with a Proof‑of‑Stake validator set, supplying low‑fee EVM smart contracts. The Polygon 2.0 roadmap introduces Aggregation Layer and.zk‑powered chains (CDK) that will share a unified POL staking token. Partnerships with Starbucks Odyssey and DraftKings underline its consumer‑brand strategy.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Injective
TVL$14.77M
24h Volume$5.25M
24h Fees$775
24h Revenue$232
30d Fees$34.5K
30d Revenue$9K
7d TVL Change+30.16%
Dominance0.01%
Polygon
TVL$676.83M
24h Volume$149.15M
24h Fees$1.77M
24h Revenue$675.3K
30d Fees$36.92M
30d Revenue$17.97M
7d TVL Change-2.53%
Dominance0.24%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Injective
2.1%Polygon
97.9%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Injective
3.4%Polygon
96.6%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Injective
1.0%Polygon
100.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Injective
1.0%Polygon
100.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Injective
30.16%Polygon
-2.53%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Injective
0.0%Polygon
0.2%TVL Comparison
Injective
Polygon