Manta vs Polygon

Compare Manta and Polygon on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$3.46M
Manta Pacific is a modular zk‑EVM Layer‑2 that stores rollup data on Celestia DA and uses universal circuits to keep prover costs low. Users can deploy privacy‑preserving smart contracts with built‑in zero‑knowledge widgets for shielding balances. The 2025 ‘Marlin’ release adds Account Abstraction and native bridges to Polkadot’s parachain ecosystem.
View Full Page
$785.1M
Polygon PoS combines Plasma checkpoints with a Proof‑of‑Stake validator set, supplying low‑fee EVM smart contracts. The Polygon 2.0 roadmap introduces Aggregation Layer and.zk‑powered chains (CDK) that will share a unified POL staking token. Partnerships with Starbucks Odyssey and DraftKings underline its consumer‑brand strategy.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Manta
TVL
$3.46M
24h Volume
$9.94M
24h Fees
$3.8K
24h Revenue
$1.1K
30d Fees
$41.8K
30d Revenue
$6.2K
7d TVL Change
-6.11%
Dominance
0.00%
Polygon
TVL
$785.1M
24h Volume
$26.02M
24h Fees
$6.2K
24h Revenue
$3.2K
30d Fees
$4.03M
30d Revenue
$1.14M
7d TVL Change
-3.98%
Dominance
0.28%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Manta
1.0%
Polygon
99.6%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Manta
27.6%
Polygon
72.4%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Manta
37.7%
Polygon
62.3%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Manta
25.7%
Polygon
74.3%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Manta
-6.11%
Polygon
-3.98%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Manta
0.0%
Polygon
0.3%
TVL Comparison
Manta
Polygon