Near vs Sonic
Compare Near and Sonic on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$234.78M
NEAR Protocol employs Nightshade sharding where each block contains chunks from multiple shards, and Doomslug consensus gives 1‑second near‑finality. The JavaScript SDK and Contract Aurora EVM make onboarding Web2 developers easier. In 2024 NEAR launched a chain‑signature wallet standard that leverages passkeys for seedless login.
View Full Page$19.74M
Sonic is an ultra‑fast EVM Layer‑1 claimed to reach 400k TPS and sub‑second finality via a custom SonicVM and DAG‑based consensus dubbed Tempo. Blocks are final once two‑thirds of stake attest, and state is stored in an in‑memory ledger that snapshots to disk every epoch. The project focuses on GameFi and real‑time social dApps, with an incentive testnet launched in May 2025.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Near
TVL$234.78M
24h Volume$119.61M
24h Fees$63.7K
24h Revenue$175.1K
30d Fees$9.54M
30d Revenue$2.77M
7d TVL Change+9.09%
Dominance0.08%
Sonic
TVL$19.74M
24h Volume$2.1M
24h Fees$6.7K
24h Revenue$3.1K
30d Fees$282.9K
30d Revenue$136.3K
7d TVL Change+11.52%
Dominance0.01%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Near
92.2%Sonic
7.8%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Near
98.3%Sonic
1.7%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Near
90.5%Sonic
9.5%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Near
98.2%Sonic
1.8%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Near
9.09%Sonic
11.52%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Near
0.1%Sonic
0.0%TVL Comparison
Near
Sonic