Near vs Tempo
Compare Near and Tempo on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$244.03M
NEAR Protocol employs Nightshade sharding where each block contains chunks from multiple shards, and Doomslug consensus gives 1‑second near‑finality. The JavaScript SDK and Contract Aurora EVM make onboarding Web2 developers easier. In 2024 NEAR launched a chain‑signature wallet standard that leverages passkeys for seedless login.
View Full Page$106.89M
Key Metrics Comparison
Near
TVL$244.03M
24h Volume$141.95M
24h Fees$35K
24h Revenue$89.5K
30d Fees$8.81M
30d Revenue$2.66M
7d TVL Change-1.46%
Dominance0.26%
Tempo
TVL$106.89M
24h Volume$631.8K
24h Fees$94
24h Revenue$0
30d Fees$5K
30d Revenue$3
7d TVL Change+0.74%
Dominance0.12%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Near
69.5%Tempo
30.5%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Near
99.6%Tempo
1.0%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Near
99.7%Tempo
1.0%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Near
100.0%Tempo
1.0%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Near
-1.46%Tempo
0.74%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Near
0.3%Tempo
0.1%TVL Comparison
Near
Tempo