Polygon vs TON
Compare Polygon and TON on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$686.22M
Polygon PoS combines Plasma checkpoints with a Proof‑of‑Stake validator set, supplying low‑fee EVM smart contracts. The Polygon 2.0 roadmap introduces Aggregation Layer and.zk‑powered chains (CDK) that will share a unified POL staking token. Partnerships with Starbucks Odyssey and DraftKings underline its consumer‑brand strategy.
View Full Page$48.97M
The Open Network (TON) is a sharded Layer‑1 originally designed by Telegram, featuring dynamic workchains and instant cross‑shard consensus through the Vertical Blockchain mechanism. The TON Storage and TON DNS services extend functionality beyond payments, whereas the Tap‑to‑Transfer feature has onboarded millions of Telegram users. A 2025 governance vote approved jetton fee burns to make TON mildly deflationary.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Polygon
TVL$686.22M
24h Volume$133.02M
24h Fees$1.22M
24h Revenue$561.2K
30d Fees$36.95M
30d Revenue$17.96M
7d TVL Change+0.98%
Dominance0.24%
TON
TVL$48.97M
24h Volume$2.9M
24h Fees$1.25M
24h Revenue$51.6K
30d Fees$35.03M
30d Revenue$1.24M
7d TVL Change-6.28%
Dominance0.02%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Polygon
93.3%TON
6.7%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Polygon
97.9%TON
2.1%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Polygon
49.4%TON
50.6%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Polygon
91.6%TON
8.4%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Polygon
0.98%TON
-6.28%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Polygon
0.2%TON
0.0%TVL Comparison
Polygon
TON