Polygon vs TON
Compare Polygon and TON on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$785.1M
Polygon PoS combines Plasma checkpoints with a Proof‑of‑Stake validator set, supplying low‑fee EVM smart contracts. The Polygon 2.0 roadmap introduces Aggregation Layer and.zk‑powered chains (CDK) that will share a unified POL staking token. Partnerships with Starbucks Odyssey and DraftKings underline its consumer‑brand strategy.
View Full Page$49.35M
The Open Network (TON) is a sharded Layer‑1 originally designed by Telegram, featuring dynamic workchains and instant cross‑shard consensus through the Vertical Blockchain mechanism. The TON Storage and TON DNS services extend functionality beyond payments, whereas the Tap‑to‑Transfer feature has onboarded millions of Telegram users. A 2025 governance vote approved jetton fee burns to make TON mildly deflationary.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Polygon
TVL$785.1M
24h Volume$26.02M
24h Fees$6.2K
24h Revenue$3.2K
30d Fees$4.03M
30d Revenue$1.14M
7d TVL Change-3.98%
Dominance0.28%
TON
TVL$49.35M
24h Volume$3.27M
24h Fees$11.4K
24h Revenue$2.5K
30d Fees$316.5K
30d Revenue$72.4K
7d TVL Change-5.66%
Dominance0.02%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Polygon
94.1%TON
5.9%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Polygon
88.8%TON
11.2%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Polygon
35.2%TON
64.8%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Polygon
55.9%TON
44.1%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Polygon
-3.98%TON
-5.66%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Polygon
0.3%TON
0.0%TVL Comparison
Polygon
TON