Near vs Polygon

Compare Near and Polygon on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.

$106.59M
NEAR Protocol employs Nightshade sharding where each block contains chunks from multiple shards, and Doomslug consensus gives 1‑second near‑finality. The JavaScript SDK and Contract Aurora EVM make onboarding Web2 developers easier. In 2024 NEAR launched a chain‑signature wallet standard that leverages passkeys for seedless login.
View Full Page
$785.1M
Polygon PoS combines Plasma checkpoints with a Proof‑of‑Stake validator set, supplying low‑fee EVM smart contracts. The Polygon 2.0 roadmap introduces Aggregation Layer and.zk‑powered chains (CDK) that will share a unified POL staking token. Partnerships with Starbucks Odyssey and DraftKings underline its consumer‑brand strategy.
View Full Page

Key Metrics Comparison

Near
TVL
$106.59M
24h Volume
$22.44M
24h Fees
$5.1K
24h Revenue
$1K
30d Fees
$92.4K
30d Revenue
$18.5K
7d TVL Change
-3.47%
Dominance
0.04%
Polygon
TVL
$785.1M
24h Volume
$26.02M
24h Fees
$6.2K
24h Revenue
$3.2K
30d Fees
$4.03M
30d Revenue
$1.14M
7d TVL Change
-3.98%
Dominance
0.28%

Category Performance

Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.

TVL Share

Share of combined TVL

TVL Share
Near
12.0%
Polygon
88.0%

Volume Share

Share of combined 24h volume

Volume Share
Near
46.3%
Polygon
53.7%

Fees Share

Share of combined 24h fees

Fees Share
Near
45.0%
Polygon
55.0%

Revenue Share

Share of combined 24h revenue

Revenue Share
Near
24.3%
Polygon
75.7%

7d TVL Performance

TVL change over last 7 days

7d TVL Performance
Near
-3.47%
Polygon
-3.98%

Dominance

Market dominance by TVL

Dominance
Near
0.0%
Polygon
0.3%
TVL Comparison
Near
Polygon