Near vs Polygon
Compare Near and Polygon on TVL, fees, revenue and activity to understand how these projects stack up.
$233.14M
NEAR Protocol employs Nightshade sharding where each block contains chunks from multiple shards, and Doomslug consensus gives 1‑second near‑finality. The JavaScript SDK and Contract Aurora EVM make onboarding Web2 developers easier. In 2024 NEAR launched a chain‑signature wallet standard that leverages passkeys for seedless login.
View Full Page$678.01M
Polygon PoS combines Plasma checkpoints with a Proof‑of‑Stake validator set, supplying low‑fee EVM smart contracts. The Polygon 2.0 roadmap introduces Aggregation Layer and.zk‑powered chains (CDK) that will share a unified POL staking token. Partnerships with Starbucks Odyssey and DraftKings underline its consumer‑brand strategy.
View Full PageKey Metrics Comparison
Near
TVL$233.14M
24h Volume$119.61M
24h Fees$63.7K
24h Revenue$175.1K
30d Fees$9.54M
30d Revenue$2.77M
7d TVL Change+9.09%
Dominance0.08%
Polygon
TVL$678.01M
24h Volume$149.15M
24h Fees$1.77M
24h Revenue$675.3K
30d Fees$36.92M
30d Revenue$17.97M
7d TVL Change-2.53%
Dominance0.24%
Category Performance
Visual comparison across key categories. Ring fill represents relative strength or share between the two assets.
TVL Share
Share of combined TVL
Near
25.6%Polygon
74.4%Volume Share
Share of combined 24h volume
Near
44.5%Polygon
55.5%Fees Share
Share of combined 24h fees
Near
3.5%Polygon
96.5%Revenue Share
Share of combined 24h revenue
Near
20.6%Polygon
79.4%7d TVL Performance
TVL change over last 7 days
Near
9.09%Polygon
-2.53%Dominance
Market dominance by TVL
Near
0.1%Polygon
0.2%TVL Comparison
Near
Polygon